Tell us what you think
Staff at a major music festival were exposed to very high noise levels without adequate care for their safety. This was a large music festival with more than 50,000 people present and with two major outdoor stages.
The following problems were found:
Hearing protection had not been considered for staff at the food outlets.
The Table below gives the daily noise exposure for workers at the festival.
| Job | Location | Hearing protection | LEP,d dB |
| Paramedic | Side of main stage | Muffs | 100 |
| First aider | Tent at side of main stage | Muffs when outside tent | 97 |
| Food service | By PA delays of main stage | None | 100 |
| Gate security | Side of main stage | None | 101 |
| Gate security | Wheel chair area for main stage | None | 95 |
| Door security | Secondary venue tent - 1 | None | 99 |
| Stage security | Secondary venue tent - 1 | Ear plugs | 108 |
| Door security | Secondary venue tent - 2 | None | 103 |
| Drummer | On stage | None | 104 |
| Bass guitarist | On stage | None | 101 |
| FoH sound engineer | Tower approx. 30m from stage | Earplugs | 99 |
| Monitor engineer | Side of stage, behind PA | None | 96 |
The use of noise control and hearing protection was inadequate. Both the event organiser and the individual employers were in clear breach of the law.
Under the law employers have a duty to protect their own employees from the risks associated with high noise exposures. In addition there is a duty to other workers who are also put at risk by their noisy activities. These duties had clearly been neglected.
Exposure needs to be reduced by means other than hearing protection as outlined in this chapter. Where a risk still remains the correct fitting and use of hearing protection needs to be enforced.
Employees have a duty to use hearing protection provided for them if their exposure is likely to exceed 85 dB.